{"id":160,"date":"2015-05-04T15:09:38","date_gmt":"2015-05-04T15:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scientificspam.net\/?p=160"},"modified":"2015-05-04T15:11:07","modified_gmt":"2015-05-04T15:11:07","slug":"listed-george-washington-university","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/?p=160","title":{"rendered":"LISTED: George Washington University"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, a Robert S. Siegel (<A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.gwdocs.com\/cancer\/robert-s-siegel\">profile on Uni website<\/A>) sent out Scientific Spam through the ESP Constant Contact, asking recipients to <em>Join [Him] at GW&#8217;s Hematology &#038; Medical Oncology Best Practices<\/em>.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nWe asked Dr. Siegel to detail the origins of the mailing list, cc&#8217;ing Postmaster.  Postmaster bounced, so we cc&#8217;d the role address found in the domain registration for gwu.edu.  All we&#8217;ve got so far is a L-SOFT confirmation that the message was distributed to the members of the role account mailing list.  No response from Doctor, nothing from the University admins, and nothing from Constant Contact.<\/p>\n<p>Today, more spam (<em>Register Today for  GW&#8217;s Oncology Update<\/em>), so we listed gwu.edu on our RHSBL. We didn&#8217;t list Constant Contact&#8217;s domain name or IP range(s) yet, but given more non-responses and more spam, that could be in the cards too.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s regrettable that we have to resort to measures against one of our own, as it were (with several hundred addresses on Scientific Spammers&#8217; lists that we know of), but sending Scientific Spam to colleagues is just as objectionable as sending 419 spam to mugus.  Or at least we think so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, a Robert S. Siegel (profile on Uni website) sent out Scientific Spam through the ESP Constant Contact, asking recipients to Join [Him] at GW&#8217;s Hematology &#038; Medical Oncology Best Practices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,58],"tags":[83,84,82],"class_list":["post-160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-esp-problem","category-university-spam","tag-constantcontact-com","tag-george-washington-university","tag-gwu-edu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":165,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions\/165"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientificspam.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}